Implications Of Kargil War

(Nazish Murtaza, karachi)

INTRODUCTION

Before the Partition of India in 1947, Kargil was part of Gilgit-Baltistan, a region of many diverse linguistic, ethnic and religious groups, due in part to the many isolated valleys separated by some of the world's highest mountains. The First Kashmir War (1947-48) resulted in most of the Kargil region remaining an Indian territory; then, Notably, Kargil is the only district in the Ladakh subdivision that has a Muslim majority. The town and district of Kargil is in what is now called Jammu and Kashmir. The town lies on the Line of Control (LOC), the defacto border for the two nations, located 120 km (75 miles) from Srinagar, facing the Northern Areas. Like other areas in the Himalayas, it has a temperate climate. Summers are cool with frigid nights, while winters are long and chilly with temperatures often dropping to -40 °C (-40 °F). A national highway connecting Srinagar to Leh cuts through Kargil.

KARGIL CONFLICT

The Kargil War, also known as the Kargil conflict,Was an armed conflict between India and Pakistan that took place between May and July 1999 in the Kargil district of Kashmir. The cause of the war was the infiltration of Pakistani soldiers and Kashmiri militants into positions on the Indian side of the Line of Control, which serves as the de facto border between the two nations. Directly after the war, Pakistan blamed the fighting entirely on independent Kashmiri insurgents; however, documents left behind by casualties and later statements by Pakistan's Prime Minister and Chief of Army Staff showed involvement of Pakistani paramilitary forces. The Indian Army, supported by the Indian Air Force, attacked the Pakistani positions and, with international diplomatic support, eventually forced a Pakistani withdrawal across the Line of

Control (LoC)

The war is one of the most recent examples of high altitude warfare in mountainous terrain, and posed significant logistical problems for the combating sides. This was the first ground war between the two countries after they had developed nuclear weapons. (India and Pakistan both test-detonated fission devices in May 1998, though the first Indian nuclear test was conducted in 1974.) The conflict led to heightened tensions between the two nations and increased defence spending on the part of India. In Pakistan, the aftermath caused instability to the government and the economy, and on October 12, 1999 a coup d'etat by the military placed army chief Pervez Musharraf in power.

IMPLICATIONS OF KARGIL WAR

•India has been engaged previously in wars with Pakistan and Kargil was no different. Thus, the socio-political implications were not too different from those resulting during previous Indo-Pak conflicts. It has affected Pakistan more than India.

•Kargil caused a major political change in Pakistan, which is that Musharraf became the unopposed arbiter of administrative reforms as well as national security.

•That war aims are different from everyday political aims in that they are not definitive or publicly announced. Also, they change depending on how the war advances.

•The Kargil conflict contributed to the rise of right-wing politics that has intensified in both the countries. Extreme right-wing forces are particularly involved with non-parliamentary parties that are gaining ground and criticize the established governing parties .The right-wing forces also have a large mobilizing capacity. The rise of right-wing parties suggests an increasing embattlement of the regular parties but also of the liberals in all segments of Pakistani society. The Kargil war prefaced a rise in communal and sectarian violence and attacks on minorities in both countries. Also, a change in the attitude of both societies towards the United States took place in the wake of the conflict. In Pakistan there was growing anti-U.S. sentiment, whereas in India, an ambivalent attitude gave way to a more positive one.

• The Kargil conflict led to a shake-up in the Indian intelligence apparatus. In India this shake-up resulted in the formation of new institutions such as Chief of Defense Staff (CDS), but the Pakistani military apparatus more or less remained the same. In India there was consensus among the political elite on various defense refurbishment issues, but not so in Pakistan.

•In the wake of Kargil, India has instituted various changes in its higher defense management, operational deployments in Kashmir, and nuclear command and control structure. The concept of limited war has now become a buzzword of Indian strategic thinking. Basrur argued that Indian sincerity in the peaceful resolution of Kashmir with Pakistan is evident from its cease-fire offer to militants, and also its initiation of dialogue with the Musharraf regime at Agra

•The United States also came to believe that it could play a central role in mediating Indian-Pakistani conflict, as observed during Kargil (e.g., the Clinton-Sharif meeting in Washington). In this vein, the United States now leans towards the LoC as a potential long-term resolution

Impact of Kargil war on Pakistan Domestic Politics and Security

The Pakistan state's involvement with militant religious groups. The conflict also brought to the surface the dissention among the highest echelons of Pakistan's political and strategic decision-makers the Kargil conflict affected Pakistan's politics and society in many ways

1.it deepened the already brewing distrust between the military and the political establishment;

2.it produced tensions between the military and religious groups;

3.it raised questions about the responsibility and reliability of the Pakistani state among the community of nations;

4.it damaged the professional reputation of the Pakistani army, allowed the international media to portray it as a rogue organization;

5.The public in the dark about the government's involvement in the Kargil conflict.

Nazish Murtaza
About the Author: Nazish Murtaza Currently, no details found about the author. If you are the author of this Article, Please update or create your Profile here.